Status of head and neck brachytherapy in Spain in 2022

Purpose Brachytherapy (BT) has been used for many years for disease control in tumours of the head and neck area (H&N). It is currently performed with high dose rate (HDR) or pulsed dose rate (PDR), but its use has been reduced due to the implementation of new non-invasive external beam radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulation (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and the improvement of surgical techniques. Methods The Spanish Brachytherapy Group (GEB) has carried out a survey to find out the number of centres in Spain that continue to use BT in H&N and its indications and expectations for the future. Results The results were presented at the XX GEB Consensus Meeting held on October 21, 2022, in Valencia (Spain) and it was confirmed that, although there are fewer and fewer centres that use BT in H&N, there are still units with extensive experience in this technique that should be positioned as referral centres. Conclusion It is necessary to carry out continuous work with other specialities involved, such as H&N surgeons, and other radiation oncologists, to improve the training of residents, both oncologists and medical physicists (AU)

Status of head and neck brachytherapy in Spain in 2022.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) has been used for many years for disease control in tumours of the head and neck area (H&N). It is currently performed with high dose rate (HDR) or pulsed dose rate (PDR), but its use has been reduced due to the implementation of new non-invasive external beam radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulation (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and the improvement of surgical techniques. METHODS: The Spanish Brachytherapy Group (GEB) has carried out a survey to find out the number of centres in Spain that continue to use BT in H&N and its indications and expectations for the future. RESULTS: The results were presented at the XX GEB Consensus Meeting held on October 21, 2022, in Valencia (Spain) and it was confirmed that, although there are fewer and fewer centres that use BT in H&N, there are still units with extensive experience in this technique that should be positioned as referral centres. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to carry out continuous work with other specialities involved, such as H&N surgeons, and other radiation oncologists, to improve the training of residents, both oncologists and medical physicists.

A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the course of visual acuity (VA) in visual outcomes of patients treated with iodine-125 (125I) brachytherapy in our center, based on original VA before treatment. Material and methods: Visual acuity was prospectively assessed using a case series of 305 patients treated with 125I between 1996 and 2022. To examine how VA behaves over time, we divided patient sample into 4 groups: (1) Patients with visual acuity of less than V ≤ 0.1 at baseline; (2) Patients with low to moderate VA, ranging 0.1 < V < 0.4; (3) Patients with moderate-high VA, ranging 0.4 < V < 0.8; (4) Patients with very high VA of V > 0.8. Each of the four groups was studied separately over a 60-month period to determine the percentage of patients with VA improvement, worsening, or with the same VA status. Finally, visual outcomes over time were estimated with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and VA maintenance rates were reported at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up. Results: The median follow-up time was 78.2 months (range, 6-254 months). The cumulative probabilities of survival analysis at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 16%, 3%, 2%, and none for the first sub-group; 46%, 20%, 17%, and 14% for the second; 65%, 53%, 29%, and 15% for the third; and 86%, 56%, 48%, and 41% for the fourth sub-group. The median survival in years was 0.30, 0.80, 3.10, and 4.40 for each sub-cohort, respectively. Conclusions: The decrease and maintenance of VA depends on the initial VA of patients. Most patients experience a marked worsening of their VA, regardless of their VA status before treatment with episcleral brachytherapy. Patients with a higher baseline VA retain VA best over time.

Brachytherapy in the prevention of recurrence of conjunctival melanoma : Results of a case report in a University Hospital in Valladolid, Spain.

AIM: Describe the results of brachytherapy in the prevention of recurrences in conjunctival melanoma (CM) and describe a dosimetric protocol. METHODS: Retrospective and descriptive case report. Eleven consecutive patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of CM treated with brachytherapy between 1992 and 2023 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and dosimetric characteristics as well as recurrences were recorded. Quantitative variables were represented by the mean, median, and standard deviation, and qualitative variables by frequency of distribution. RESULTS: Of a total of 27 patients diagnosed with CM, 11 who were treated with brachytherapy were included in the study (7 female; mean age at time of treatment: 59.4 years). Mean follow-up was 58.82 months (range 11-141 months). Of a total of 11 patients, 8 were treated with ruthenium-106 and 3 with iodine-125. Brachytherapy was performed in 6 patients as adjuvant therapy after biopsy-proven CM on histopathology and in the other 5 patients after recurrence. The mean dose was 85 Gy in all cases. Recurrences outside of the previously irradiated area were observed in 3 patients, metastases were diagnosed in 2 patients, and one case of an ocular adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy is an adjuvant treatment option in invasive conjunctival melanoma. In our case report, only one patient had an adverse effect. However, this topic requires further research. Furthermore, each case is unique and should be evaluated by experts in a multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, radiation oncologists, and physicists.

Regression of posterior uveal melanoma following iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy based on pre-treatment tumor apical height.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze regression rates and local control of uveal melanoma patients treated with iodine-125 ( 125I) brachytherapy based on initial tumor apical height. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients treated in a single institution from January 1st, 1996 to 2019 with 125I plaques (ROPES and COMS) for uveal melanoma were included in this study. Patients treated with brachytherapy for iris and those treated with transpupillary thermotherapy prior to brachytherapy were excluded. The sample was classified into 4 categories depending on initial apical tumor height (h0), i.e., h0 ≤ 2.5 (small), 2.5 < h0 ≤ 6.25 (small-medium), 6.25 < h0 ≤ 10 (medium-large), and h0 > 10 mm (large). Percentage of original tumor apical height (Δh) was collected during follow-ups. Patterns of regression were evaluated using linear least squares adjustments. Multivariable Cox regression were performed. RESULTS: In total, 305 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 27, 166, 100, and 13 were considered for small, small-medium, medium-large, and large categories, respectively. Median follow-up was 82.4, 56.8, 76.1, 89.1, and 100.1 months for the entire cohort and each sub-group, respectively. Pattern of decrease when h0 ≤ 2.5 mm was not detectable. For the rest sub-groups, changes in height could be fitted using functional form: Δh (T) = ae-bT + c, R 2 ≥ 0.97. Multivariate Cox analysis factors predictive of local control failure revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.1 (95% CI: 0.7-58.2%, p = 0.05) for patients who remained similar sized after treatment for small-medium tumors. For the rest sub-groups, Cox analysis did not indicate statistical significance in any single variable. CONCLUSIONS: Height changes can be modeled by a negative exponential function for the first 7 years after treatment depending on the initial height, except for those less than 2.5 mm. Non-responding small-medium tumors multiply by 6 the probability of failure in local control.

Treatment planning considerations for 125I eye plaque brachytherapy.

Effective cancer brachytherapy requires a treatment plan that delivers high-dose to tumor, while minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of the sources and magnitude of the techniques is essential for producing robust and well optimized-plans. The purpose of this technical note is to establish general procedures and strategies for optimization and customization of the plaques loaded with radioactive seeds, particularly focusing on the definition of useful tactics to limit high doses to organs at risk and adapt the treatment time to the necessity of institution.

Radiobiological doses, tumor, and treatment features influence on local control, enucleation rates, and survival after epiescleral brachytherapy. A 20-year retrospective analysis from a single-institution: part I.

PURPOSE: To assess influence of the radiobiological doses, tumor, and treatment features on local control, enucleation rates, overall and disease-specific survival rates after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Local control, enucleation, overall and disease-specific survival rates were evaluated on the base of 243 patients from 1996 through 2016, using plaques loaded with iodine sources. Clinical and radiotherapy data were extracted from a dedicated prospective database. Biologically effective dose (BED) was included in survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions. The 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year relative survival rates were estimated, and univariate/multivariate regression models were constructed for predictive factors of each item. Hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval at 95% (CI) were determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 73.9 months (range, 3-202 months). Cumulative probabilities of survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3, 5, 10 and 15 years were respectively: 96%, 94%, 93%, and 87%, for local control; 93%, 88%, 81%, and 73% for globe preservation; 98%, 93%, 84%, and 73% for overall survival, and 98%, 96%, 92%, and 87% for disease-specific survival. By multivariate analysis, we concluded variables as significant: for local control failure - the longest basal diameter and the juxtapapillary location; for globe preservation failure - the longest basal dimension, the mushroom shape, the location in ciliary body, and the dose to the foveola; for disease-specific survival - the longest basal dimension. Some radiobiological doses were significant in univariate models but not in multivariate ones for the items studied. CONCLUSIONS: The results show as predictive factors of local control, enucleation, and disease-specific survival rates those related with the features of the tumor, specifically the longest basal dimension. There is no clear relation between radiobiological doses or treatment parameters in patients after brachytherapy.

Radiobiological doses, tumor, and treatment features influence on outcomes after epiescleral brachytherapy. A 20-year retrospective analysis from a single-institution: part II.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of the radiobiological doses, tumor, and treatment features on retinopathy, cataracts, retinal detachment, optic neuropathy, vitreous hemorrhage, and neovascular glaucoma at the authors' institution after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 243 eyes with uveal melanoma, treated by iodine brachytherapy between 1996 and 2016 at a single center were analyzed. Clinical and radiotherapy data were extracted from a dedicated database. Biologically effective dose (BED) was included in survival analysis performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions. Relative survival rates were estimated, and univariate/multivariate regression models were constructed for predictive factors of each item. Hazard ratio and confidence interval at 95% were determined. Variables statistically significant were analyzed and compared by log-rank tests. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 73.9 months (range, 3-202 months). Cumulative probabilities of survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 and 5 years, respectively, were: 59% and 48% for retinopathy; 71% and 55% for cataracts; 63% and 57% for retinal detachment; 88% and 79% for optic neuropathy; 87% and 83% for vitreous hemorrhage; 92% and 89% for neovascular glaucoma, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, statistically significant risk factors were: age, tumor apical height, dose to foveola, and location of anterior border for retinopathy; age, dose to lens, type of plaque, and tumor shape, for cataracts; age, tumor apical height, and size of the plaque for retinal detachment; age, plaque shape, longest basal dimension, and BED to optic nerve for optic neuropathy; age, tumor apical height, and tumor shape for vitreous hemorrhage; tumor apical height and BED to foveola for neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor factors in addition to radiation treatment may contribute to secondary effects. Enhanced clinical optimization should evaluate radiobiological doses delivered to the tumor volume and surrounding normal ocular structures.

Visual outcome after posterior uveal melanoma episcleral brachytherapy including radiobiological doses.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term influence of radiobiological doses in the evolution of visual acuity (VA) in patients with uveal melanoma treated by episcleral brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visual acuity was evaluated prospectively from a case series of 243 patients in 2016 treated with 125I. Data analysis was applied to trend VA outcome and find the accurate best-fit line. Biologically effective dose (BED) was included in survival analysis with the use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions. Hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval at 95% (CI) were determined. Variables statistically significant were analyzed and compared by log-rank tests. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 74.2 months (range, 3-223). Exponential regression shows a 25% reduction and 50% in visual acuity score (VAS) scale for 5 and 27.8 months, respectively. Cumulative probabilities of survival analysis were 57%, 42%, 27%, and 23% at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis found tumor height (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29), applicator size (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.08-1.36), juxtapapillary localization (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.01-2.84), and dose to foveola (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01) significantly associated with VA loss. Log-rank tests were significant for all those variables. BED has a strong influence in univariate model, but not statistically significant in the multivariate one. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity changes can be modeled by an exponential function for the first 5 years after treatment. No relation between VA loss and BED has been found; nevertheless, apical height, plaque size, juxtapapillary localization, and dose to fovea were found as statistical significant variables.

Pattern of Local Recurrence After I-125 Episcleral Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma in a Spanish Referral Ocular Oncology Unit.

PURPOSE: To describe the time, frequency, and clinical characteristics of treatment failure after I-125 brachytherapy in patients with uveal melanoma treated and followed in a Spanish referral ocular oncology unit. DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive, interventional case series. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma from 1995 to 2016 and treated with episcleral brachytherapy were included. Demographic data collection, ophthalmic evaluation, ultrasound scan, and systemic studies were performed at baseline, every 6 months thereafter for 5 years, and subsequently at annual intervals. Recurrence was defined as presence of tumor growth after treatment. Baseline analysis was performed by descriptive methods and survival by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: From 732 patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma, 311 were treated with brachytherapy. In the follow-up (mean 79 months, standard deviation = 55), 16 local tumor recurrences (5.1%) were detected. All relapsing patients had choroidal tumors and 15 presented with visual symptoms. All patients were treated with I-125 brachytherapy, and 2 received associated transpupillary thermotherapy. All the eyes were enucleated after recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a mean time of recurrence of 3.7 years (standard deviation = 2.94 years, ranging from 1 to 12 years). Three patients had metastasis in the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed worse survival for patients with recurrence. CONCLUSION: Local treatment failure was a relatively infrequent event after I-125 brachytherapy in our series. Recurrences appear not only early but also late in the follow-up. They do not have a distinctive clinical pattern and are associated with poorer survival.

Parkinsonism secondary to metastatic lesions within the central nervous system: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common human diseases worldwide, and metastases are detected in approximately 20% of patients at diagnosis. Brain metastases occur in only 4% of cases, however, and usually present with hemiparesis or other motor or sensory symptoms. There have been only a few reports of parkinsonism secondary to a brain tumor-related mass effect. CASE PRESENTATION: We present an unusual case of parkinsonism secondary to multiple brain metastases. A 57-year-old Caucasian man had recently been diagnosed with primary carcinoma of the colon and had multiple metastases in the lungs and liver. He subsequently developed bilateral symmetrical parkinsonism, and multiple brain tumors were detected by computed tomography scanning. The condition of our patient deteriorated rapidly, and he became akinetic and dependent for all activities of daily living. He was followed up and treated at home by our palliative care unit team and died two weeks after the onset of his neurologic symptoms. CONCLUSION: Although primary and secondary brain tumors are uncommon causes of parkinsonism, their clinical presentation may resemble that of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. An awareness of this rare differential diagnosis is therefore important in ensuring early diagnosis and treatment, thus improving prognosis and quality of life. A rapid progression in neurologic symptoms was observed in our patient, and clinicians should be alert to this atypical presentation of secondary parkinsonism.